Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
John Popelish wrote: We are not talking about L, C, R, or any other inherent property changing with frequency. The velocity factor of the coil is based on those quantities and can be calculated. What's the formula, Cecil? Also, what is the dominant mode of a single wire, loading-coil transmission line: TE, TM, TEM, or what? If not TEM, how do you calculate the cutoff frequency? If I terminate one of these things in the right impedance will it act like an infinite transmission line? Given your loading coil terminated in a given impedance, what is the expression for the impedance looking into it? I suppose you also have something that will tell us how to find your coil's characteristic impedance; o.k., out with it. All this bluster and threatening rhetoric aren't advancing the acceptance of your crackpot theory one inch, Cecil. I don't see anything wrong with at least attempting to characterize a loading coil as a transmission line as long as the attempt is done dispassionately with real theory and an acceptance of the possibility of failure as part of the effort. Desperately thinking up excuses for an idea you made up in your head, and becoming emotionally distraught when people don't buy those excuses, is a waste of your time and everyone else's. 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |