Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: is only 40% shortening. I think the lumped inductor crossover point is probably pretty far below 4 MHz. There isn't any "crossover point". That point has been made several times by different people. One of those people supporting a "crossover point" is Dr. Corum in his IEEE peer reviewed paper at: http://www.ttr.com/TELSIKS2001-MASTER-1.pdf (page 6) Dr. Corum is pretty clear about 15 degrees, i.e. 4% of a wavelength, being the "crossover point". He considers 15 degrees to 90 degrees to require a distributed network analysis while below 15 degrees, "one passes to the lumped- element regime ..." The "crossover point" would be the same rule as for a transmission line. How long does a transmission line with reflections have to be before it is no longer valid to consider it a lumped piece of wire. 15 degrees is 4% of a wavelength and sounds reasonable. However, under the right conditions, one could arrange a current node at the halfway point of that 15 degrees of feedline thus causing current to flow into both ends of the feeline at the same time. 1/2 cycle later, current would be flowing out of both ends. How would a lumped-circuit model handle those conditions? The "crossover point" is obviously arbitrary but if one locates it very far above 15 degrees, according to Dr. Corum, one risks invalid analysis results such as have been reported here. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |