Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Lewallen wrote:
For that case, it's been theoretically and demonstratively shown to be equal at both ends. Only one of the reported measurements showed the magnitudes of the currents to be equal and that was a small toroidal coil quite unlike a 75m bugcatcher coil. Wes's web page shows the currents to be unequal at the ends of the coil. Figure 3 shows 1.03 amps at the bottom of the coil and 0.66 amps at the top of the coil. That's not equal. http://www.k6mhe.com/n7ws/Loaded%20antennas.htm -- Here's an example from EZNEC where the currents are not only unequal, but if one considers to standing wave current to be flowing, more current is flowing into the bottom of the coil than out the top. What does the lumped-circuit model have to say about that? This technical question goes unanswered. http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp/qrzgif35.gif -- As for phase shift using standing wave current, consider the following half of a dipole: FP----------x----------y---------- 'x' is at the 30 degree point and 'y' is at the 60 degree point. What is the standing wave phase shift between point 'x' and point 'y'? We can see from Figure 14-4 in Kraus' "Antennas for All Applications", 3rd edition, that the measured phase shift would be zero between 'x' and 'y'. So why is it a surprise that if the wire between 'x' and 'y' is replaced by a coil, the phase shift remains zero? The measured phase shift in the wire and the coil are the same. This technical question goes unanswered. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |