Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark" wrote:
On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 21:40:40 GMT, "Cecil Moore" wrote: Your 100uH coil above exhibits 60 degrees of phase shift even for the voltage and that's 1/6 wavelength. That does NOT say the coil replaces 60 degrees of wire in the antenna. One who thinks such is mistaken. The phase shift in the coil is what it is. It usually does NOT correspond to the phase shift of the wire it replaces. The point of that statement was that real world phase shift is never zero. The one-way phase shift is known to be 90 degrees at the self-resonant frequency. On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 08:56:19 GMT, Cecil Moore wrote: When the speculation is that the coil presents a 1:1 replacement for the delay of the "missing" segment of the resonant antenna, then this premise stumbles at the starting blocks. Nobody said anything about a 1:1 replacement. That was just somebody's strawman. We all know who "somebody" is. [threadbuster #4] But if this is news to you, it must have been one of your other personalities (Hokum's Razor?) at the keyboard who posted the message at the top. Some people have misunderstood the meaning of that statement. See above. So many jumping to conclusions - so few trying to understand. -- 73, Cecil, W5DXP |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |