Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
Thanks Cecil. I wanted to be sure where you were at now. We still disagree about several important points. "The unwillingness of the "gurus" to answer specific technical questions is pretty disappointing." - a comment from a reader. You said you could use the lumped-circuit model to explain how the current at the top of the coil could be greater than the current at the bottom of the coil as it is at the bottom of the page at: http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp/current.htm If you are technically correct, why are you so technically silent on the subject? Does the emperor have no clothes? At least a dozen of my technical questions have gone unanswered by being ignored. Lot's of readers have noticed and commented in emails to me. If you will repeat your measurements with 1/4WL added to the top of the base-loaded mobile antenna, you will start to understand the physics involved. The current taper through a coil depends upon where in the standing wave environment that the coil is installed. The lumped-circuit analysis fails for the typical 75m amateur radio mobile antenna. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |