Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Popelish wrote:
. . . I think I agree with just about every conclusion you are making about treating coils as slow wave transmission lines. . . A coil itself isn't a slow wave transmission line. In conjunction with shunt C, it can be analyzed as a transmission line, but only in conjunction with shunt C. Remove the shunt C and it ceases looking like a transmission line. The earlier example of the modification to Cecil's EZNEC model illustrated this -- when the ground (the other side of the shunt capacitor) was removed, the current drop across the coil disappeared. As far as considering a coil itself as a "slow wave structure", Ramo and Whinnery treat this subject. It's in the chapter on waveguides, and they explain how a helix can operate as a slow wave waveguide structure. To operate in this fashion requires that TM and TE modes be supported inside the structure which in turn requires a coil diameter which is a large part of a wavelength. Axial mode helix antennas, for example, operate in this mode. Coils of the dimensions of loading coils in mobile antennas are orders of magnitude too small to support the TM and TE modes required for slow wave propagation. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |