Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian White GM3SEK wrote:
That statement was not innuendo at all. It means nothing more than what it literally says. It applies to any and every observer who attempts to construct a theory about something. Everybody is included; but nobody is exempt. It means the lumped-circuit model works where the distributed- network model fails. That is false. It is just the opposite. the distributed-network model works where the lumped-circuit model fails. The difference is that my views join up with the rest of human knowledge about antennas and circuit behaviour. Only up to where the coils are 15 degrees long. Then the distributed network model must be engaged to avoid blunders exactly like you and others are making. Yours don't. They fail that crucial test. Distributed network analysis fails the test??? Please provide an example. The IEEE would probably publish a paper on such. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |