Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Donaly wrote:
What about figure 2, Cecil? Figure 2 suggests that any coil with a delay over 15 degrees should be analyzed by discarding the lumped circuit model and instead using the distributed network model. Every coil I have talked about on this thread has a delay greater than 15 degrees. 15 degrees of impedance transformation will transform 50 ohms into 54+j120 ohms with a difference in SWRs of 7 to one. Does that really sound like a reasonable reason for keeping the lumped-circuit model? Roy just said in another posting that the reflection model will solve all the problems that the lumped circuit model will solve. It just gets clumsy as far as the math goes. It is interesting to watch the gurus retreat into fantasy where they were only ever talking about tiny point inductances to start with. Anyone who has been following this argument over the years knows otherwise. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |