Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Lewallen wrote:
Thanks, Tom, for taking the trouble to go through the numbers. As I said earlier, most of us know, and all engineers certainly should know, superposition requires that results from an analysis using the total current must be the same as the sum of the results from separate analyses using forward and reflected currents (or any other components whose sum is the total current). Your analysis shows this, as it should. Roy, would you please explain what is the technical significance of Tom's superposing the forward wave of 1 amp at zero degrees at the bottom of the coil with the forward wave of 1 amp at 45 degrees at the top of the coil when those two currents are separated in space by 12 inches and separated in time by 45 degrees of a cycle? Doesn't the superposition principle require the two signals to exist in the same space-time? The misconceptions being presented here are unbelievable but apparently exist in the engineering community. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |