Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 15:17:35 -0800, Roy Lewallen
wrote: What most people would call "self capacitance" -- the equivalent capacitance from one terminal to the other. Hi Roy, Not strictly speaking. It ("self capacitance") is with respect to a very remote reference, not merely the two plate formulation of the terminal's geometries to each other (that is more part of the distributed capacitance). There are two measures of capacitance. Self capacitance is any body's capacity to store charge. You don't need a second plate to do that in the classical math - merely a reference point from which the voltage is determined (yes, another dimensionless oddity that makes this more easily said than done). Mutual capacitance, two plate construction, is the more usual form we all have come to expect - so much so that the term mutual has fallen into disuse and most express only the second, isolated term - capacitance. Tom, a week or so back, asked about the infinitesimal capacitance of a coil with 15 meters (or so) of wire. He speculated that as the "second" plate of the (mutual) capacitance was withdrawn to infinity, that it forced the value to zero. I, on the other hand showed that in the practical universe: C = 2 · Pi · epsilon0 · L / ( ln(b/a) ) a = 1m (after all, thin is relative at infinite dimensions) L = 15m b= 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,...000m (10³³³ meters away) epsilon0 = 0.00000000000885 C = 12 femtofarads This was certainly at the limits of my usual Capacitor Bridge to measure to this resolution 30 years ago, but time has marched on. This sized capacitance is certainly encountered every day in my new field of nanotech, and 1 femtofarad is measured by charge transfer techniques. Consider, Einstein's estimate of the radius of the Universe is roughly 10 Billion Light Years (±3dB) As this result above is vastly further away than Einstein's guess (by more than 300 orders of magnitude), lets look at again from his number: C = 12.5 picofarads Oddly enough, this value is on par with the distributed capacitance of the coil's we've been pounding away on (and even more convergent, is this is roughly the same amount of wire used in them). I extracted this correlation from reports of the coils' self resonant frequency and their inductance. Self Capacitance is nothing more than Mutual Capacitance with a second spherical plate, with a radius of this 10 Billion Light Years. However, this capacitance is the total bulk of the coil rather than that distributed to form a transmission line. Anyway, thinking of a coil in terms of Mutual Capacitance, Distributed Capacitance, Self Capacitance, Self Inductance, and Mutual Inductance is a tantalizing prospect to investigate and elevate the topic to this mythic status of transmission line - but I seem to lack the motivation to go there. The extraordinary farce is more entertaining. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |