Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gene Fuller wrote:
Cecil, I just went back and checked the EZ files. The coil consists of 25 turns over a six-inch length. How does that calculate out to ten turns per foot? First, thanks for sending me those files. I have never been able to generate a 4 TPI coil in EZNEC because of proximity guidelines. How did you accomplish that? Second, I thought EZNEC stored the design specifications for the latest created coil and I was mistaken about that. EZNEC must default to ten turns per foot. However, the antenna is almost 12 feet tall, not the agreed upon 8 feet. It would take a bigger coil to resonate an 8 foot antenna at 4 MHz. Bigger coil = more delay. And I'm not encouraged by those numerous EZNEC guideline violations. Download http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp/SUPRGAIN.EZ for an omni-directional 20 dBi gain antenna that violates the EZNEC guidelines. Incidentally, there seems to be a bug in EZNEC. When I try to save the segmentation errors to a file, EZNEC barfs and closes. I can't get a look at all the errors so I don't know what they are. I will continue to tweak the files, like adding enough coil to bring an 8 foot antenna to resonance. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |