| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cecil,
I have no idea what you did, but you screwed something up quite royally. There is no way that segment 3 is too close to segment 197. I just ran a cut-down version in the EZNEC 4 demo, and I found no geometry errors. Yes, each segment length is too short, about 80% of the recommendation, but Roy indicated a couple of days ago that should not present a big problem. I cannot say much more about EZNEC, except that I did not see any problems. The coil I modeled is very similar to the Texas Bugcatcher model 680 coil. ( http://www.texasbugcatcher.com ) I don't own a Texas Bugcatcher coil, but I suspect they actually work more or less as advertised. 73, Gene W4SZ Cecil Moore wrote: wrote: Send me the file please. Don't use my akorn newsgeroup addres. I do not check it. Here's just about all you need to know about Gene's EZNEC file: http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp/ezerror.GIF EZNEC doesn't like 4 TPI coils at 4 MHz. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
| FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
| FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
| Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
| Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna | |||