Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Harrison wrote:
Tom, W8JI wrote: "Many people vizualize current in a small loading inductor as starting at one end and traveling through the conductor turn-by-turn. That`s how the experts say the coul in a TWT works, and it is no different from other coils. . . . I maintain that there's no such group as "other coils", but that coils act quite differently depending on their physical sizes and the amount of coupling between turns. I believe that current traveling down a straight wire goes at nearly the speed of light. I also believe that if you take that straight wire and wind it into a helix with very widely spaced turns, it also travels down the wire at nearly the speed of light. But if you wind a helix that's short in terms of wavelength and with a reasonable length/diameter ratio, the field from the current in each turn couples to all other turns, which makes the propagation axially from one end to the other close to the speed of light. That is, for the same length of wire, an inductor with closely coupled turns has a much lower propagation delay than one with the turns spread out in a loose helix. Do I infer from your comments that you believe that the current continues to flow along the wire at about the speed of light, so that if the wire length stays the same, the propagation delay along the widely spaced helix is the same as for the short one with close spaced turns? That is, that both these cases fall into what you categorize as "other coils", which act the same as the helix in a TWT? Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |