| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gene Fuller wrote:
Cecil, That's quite remarkable. You issued a "challenge" to design and report on a loading coil for 4 MHz, with a whip of 8 feet. I responded with a solution that used a whip length of 10 feet. I did not "alter" anything, and I told you exactly what I did. What came back in return? Three separate times you altered my file and reported back here that something was incorrectly designed, illegal, or just plain different. You did not acknowledge the changes you made until I complained. (EZNEC did not change the coil pitch or connect the bottom of the coil to the top of the coil.) I don't have a copy of the IEEE Dictionary, but I believe the correct descriptive word for your action is dishonesty. I wasn't complaining about Cecil altering your coil's dimensions Gene. I was complaining about him altering the coil I measured and altering the context of what I say. What you say about him altering your data is true, but I want you to know that *I'm first*. .... woops.....I'm not first! I just remembered this: http://www.w8ji.com/agreeing_measurements.htm Roy's first. You're way down the list Gene. Get back in line. 73 Tom |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
| FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
| FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
| Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
| Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna | |||