Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 22:00:49 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote: All measurements done by everyone are incorrect. Yours, by your own admission 59% in error, ... Uhhhh Richard, those weren't measurements. Those were calculated results, using formulas out of books. The crippling legacy of Xerox research. The only measurements that I have made were of 1. self-resonant frequencies within the accuracy of an MFJ-259B and 2. standing wave phase measurements Only indeed. Now there's some challenging qualification trials for an Olympic biathlon. that agree with Kraus Have you been sleeping with Kraus again? and EZNEC. Hmm, the same EZNEC you've impeached for accuracy? When we loop back to the top of this post to note the 59% error derived from work accomplished that "weren't measurements" and they agree with your "measurements" THAT just has to be another hallmark warning sign of bogus science - self validation. After 17,433 posts, you certainly work hard to convince yourself. ;-) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |