Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yuri Blanarovich wrote:
"Ian White GM3SEK" wrote in message ... From the beginning, then: snippydidudaa As we have seen, if the whip is loaded by pure inductance only, there is no change in current between the two terminals of the inductance - but there's a big step increase in voltage. At the upper terminal, the current is the same but the voltage is very high, so we're into a much higher-impedance environment. Reality check here. I need explanation how the above could happen. "Current stays the same ... and the big step increase in voltage." As far as "idiot" professors taught me, (current x voltage) = power. So, am I to discover that the pure inductance is better than perpetual motion amplifier of power? More power coming out of the coil than going in? Eureka!!! How could I overlook that? :-) Your professor would have told you that you "overlooked" the phase shift in the voltage. The rest is just more of the same kind of name-calling. You didn't really read what I wrote, and you don't really want to hear any answers. All you really want is a shouting match. Well, tough, you don't get one. -- 73 from Ian GM3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |