Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
K7ITM wrote: If you shove more electrons into ANY volume than you remove, you have changed the charge within that volume. That is true but having zero standing wave amps at one end of a coil and one standing wave amp at the other end doesn't mean the charge is changing. If the forward current is the same magnitude at both ends of the coil, there's no change in charge. If the reflected current is the same magnitude at both ends of the coil there's no change in charge. The standing wave current is the sum of those two phasors. That sum is what is fooling you. Please pay attention to Hecht, in "Optics". The standing wave current profile does not move through the wire just as the standing wave light profile does not move through space. Standing wave current doesn't progress through a wire just as standing wave light doesn't progress through space. It sure would be nice if were as simple as all that. We wouldn't need NEC to help us if it were. You're missing the point, Cecil, read Tom's post again, and meditate on this Ch'an buddhist koan that I just made up in my head: Is the water the wave? 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |