| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 09:35:16 -0400, "Yuri Blanarovich"
wrote: So far, it looks to me that this exercise is worthwhile if we can improve the accuracy of modeling and our understanding of the phenomena. Hi Yuri, If you can't give me a metric of what the accurcy IS, then you cannot say you've improved or worsened it at the end of the process, can you? Like I said, "What's all the fuss over? What's to be proven? and How do we know when it has BEEN proven?" You aren't providing any forward momentum. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
| FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
| FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
| Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
| Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna | |||