Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Just don't expect that the S-meter so "calibrated" is reading the real value of the incident field arriving at the rx antenna. It won't be, unless that calibration includes (exactly) the real-world performance of the receiving antenna system at each frequency, including line loss, local reflections, and other factors. Otherwise the reading still will be given in fairly meaningless, relative terms -- the same as S-units. The bottom line for the Rx, all it cares about since it doesn't know what kind of antenna is feeding it, is the signal strength at the input.... so I'd say a calibrated microvolt reading reflecting that strength is not very meaningless at all. Any changes in the antenna system will of course change that, but the whole point of any antenna work is to maximize the signal voltage to that rx input, so I'd think a calibrated reading would be extremely useful over an S meter alone. Ed K7AAT |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question is 'it' a Longwire {Random Wire} Antenna -or- Inverted "L" Antenna ? | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy | |||
Poor vertical performance on metal sheet roof - comments? | Antenna | |||
efficiency of horizontal vs vertical antennas | Antenna |