| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Of course, you could make a receiver with very nearly true logarithmic
response, by use of one of the excellent, wide dynamic range log amps which are available these days. But however much you or I might like one, the vast majority of amateurs couldn't care less about what their S meter is really indicating, so they wouldn't pay the added cost for it. On top of that, most amateurs would consider a 6dB-per-S-unit meter to be "dead", and would rather have it wiggle more. Roy Lewallen, W7EL So true, that last part! Well, I certainly understand the non- linearity of the RX when comparing gain accross the entire HF spectrum. I tend to limit my operations to top band and 75, so I hadn't considered changes in Rx gain when moving down the band (or up, as some would have it). Currently, when I do an Rx calibration, I just take some readings on my "S" meter when injecting a signal in the bands of my concern. A "list" of these readings for each band suffices, although I agree with you that that is far more than most hams would bother with. Ed , K7AAT |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Question is 'it' a Longwire {Random Wire} Antenna -or- Inverted "L" Antenna ? | Shortwave | |||
| Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
| Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy | |||
| Poor vertical performance on metal sheet roof - comments? | Antenna | |||
| efficiency of horizontal vs vertical antennas | Antenna | |||