Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ed" wrote:
The bottom line for the Rx, all it cares about since it doesn't know what kind of antenna is feeding it, is the signal strength at the input.... so I'd say a calibrated microvolt reading reflecting that strength is not very meaningless at all. ___________ Received signal strength, whether in terms of relative S-units or the measure of real incident fields, is at least as much the result of local conditions as of the ERP of the transmission source on the path toward the receiver, the frequency, and propagation conditions. So the received signal strength indication, whether relative or "real," isn't a hugely significant indicator of any of these parameters. RF |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question is 'it' a Longwire {Random Wire} Antenna -or- Inverted "L" Antenna ? | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy | |||
Poor vertical performance on metal sheet roof - comments? | Antenna | |||
efficiency of horizontal vs vertical antennas | Antenna |