Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Radiation from feedlines is grossly exaggerated.
For many purposes, practically it does not occur. When discussing the importance of such radiation one should always crudely estimate its level relative to transmitter or radiated power. If you don't know what its level is then you don't know what you are waffling about. ---- Reg. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 21:55:42 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote: If you don't know what its level is then you don't know what you are waffling about. Hi Reggie, Seeing you lack any quantifiables, are you offering belgian waffles? 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 13:58:19 -0800, Richard Clark
wrote: On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 21:55:42 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards" wrote: If you don't know what its level is then you don't know what you are waffling about. Hi Reggie, Seeing you lack any quantifiables, are you offering belgian waffles? 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Richard, Just anouther one of Reg's factoids (e pluribus unum). Danny |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Danny,
Since I am not fluent in Latin, could you please tell me what is a "Factoid"? ---- Reg. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reg Edwards wrote:
Danny, Since I am not fluent in Latin, could you please tell me what is a "Factoid"? Danny should be able to translate that. He lives at the coast, where they get lots of touroids from points inland. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 10:15:23 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote: Danny, Since I am not fluent in Latin, could you please tell me what is a "Factoid"? ---- Reg. How about English? Surely your English dictionary has it listed? http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_/factoid.html\\ (definition #1) "e pluribus unum" at one time was our national motto and still appears on our coins. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E_pluribus_unum Danny |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan Richardson adelphia net" k6mheatdot wrote in message ... On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 10:15:23 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards" wrote: Danny, Since I am not fluent in Latin, could you please tell me what is a "Factoid"? ---- Reg. How about English? Surely your English dictionary has it listed? http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_/factoid.html\\ (definition #1) ========================================= It's not in MY dictionary. I have the Concise Oxford English Dictionary, 1951 edition. But you've got it wrong. "Factoid" doesn't apply to me anyway. ---- Reg. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 13:50:07 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote: It's not in MY dictionary. I have the Concise Oxford English Dictionary, 1951 edition. From the Oxford English Dictionary: http://www.askoxford.com/results/?vi...r=score%2Cname Danny |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
FACTOID:
"A small granule of truth." A factoid is to insight, as a small hard turd is to a bowel movement. Bob Brunius, AC7PN Dan Richardson wrote: On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 13:58:19 -0800, Richard Clark wrote: On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 21:55:42 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards" wrote: If you don't know what its level is then you don't know what you are waffling about. Hi Reggie, Seeing you lack any quantifiables, are you offering belgian waffles? 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Richard, Just anouther one of Reg's factoids (e pluribus unum). Danny |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Okay, all. I rand a multi-band check on my s-meter. The results a (with the previous 80 meter test included. 80 meter +20 start S9 -18 db S8 -23 db S7 -26 db S6 -29 db S5 -32 db S4 -35 db S3 -37 db S2 -39 db S1 -41 db 40 meter +20 start S9 -18 db S8 -22 db S7 -25 db S6 -28 db S5 -31 db S4 -34 db S3 -36.5 db S2 -38.5 db S1 -41 db 30 meter +20 start S9 -19 db S8 -23 db S7 -27 db S6 -31 db S5 -34 db S4 -36 db S3 -39 db S2 -41 db S1 -43 db 20 meter +20 start S9 -19 db S8 -22 db S7 -26 db S6 -30 db S5 -34 db S3 -38 db S2 -41 db S1 -50 db There is no doubt that the readings are different, and significantly in some cases. I will give a calibration of the meter for each band that I do. Lesson learned here is that the meter should be calibrated to do this test, IMO. Yes, it is true that on any given band the readings are going to be relative to each other. But it is inevitable that questions will arise about the relative efficiency of my antennas by band, as both are multi-band antennas. Part 2 to follow soon....... -73 de Mike KB3EIA - |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question is 'it' a Longwire {Random Wire} Antenna -or- Inverted "L" Antenna ? | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy | |||
Poor vertical performance on metal sheet roof - comments? | Antenna | |||
efficiency of horizontal vs vertical antennas | Antenna |