Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy, W7EL wrote:
"It`s pretty obvious that objects in motion come to rest naturally without any external force." I`d want to switch topics from coils to inertia and Newton had I insisted a coil must have the same current at both ends in an r-f environment. Like squid they try to get away in a flood of ink. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Harrison" wrote: I`d want to switch topics from coils to inertia and Newton had I insisted a coil must have the same current at both ends in an r-f environment. Richard, lest you get nit-picked to death again, let's be clear that you are talking about a standing-wave r-f environment. If a coil is installed in a traveling-wave r-f environment, with no standing waves, the magnitude of the current through the coil will be the same at both ends, minus losses. It's the phasor sum of the forward and reflected current phasors that causes such a large variation in coil current in a standing- wave r-f environment illustrated by the graphic at: http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp/qrzgif35.gif Wonder why none of those resident gurus have bothered to explain the current distribution in that coil? Have you noticed my questions about the technical references that I have provided just keeps piling up with no responses? -- 73, Cecil, W5DXP |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current through coils | Antenna | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna |