Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Harrison wrote:
Cecil, W5DXP wrote: "Does it matter that for a vertical that the length of a dipole (L/lambda)squared is different by a factor of 4?" It doesn`t make a ratio different than two to one in the ratio of resistances of the 1/2-wave dipole to the 1/4-wave monopole. We are not comparing a monopole that is the the length of a dipole with the dipole. We are comparing a monopole that is 1//2 the length of a dipole to the dipole when we make the resistance ratio. Richard, Balanis doesn't say that the 'L' in the monopole formula is 1/2 the 'L' in the dipole formula. Does Kraus? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Electromagnetic Radiation | General | |||
Electromagnetic Radiation | Policy | |||
Radiation Resistance & Efficiency | Antenna | |||
Measuring radiation resistance | Homebrew | |||
Measuring radiation resistance | Homebrew |