Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Coslo wrote:
Yeah! I'm trying to come up with a good test protocol that will allow me to define "work". So far, I can note that some signals drop into the noise and become unreadable, while are readable on the other at the same time. That seems a bit simplistic though. My main problem is the variable signal levels., and the also variable noise levels. Turns out that the antenna that was noisier on one band is quieter on another, and vice versa. A fellow could come to the conclusion that "this ain't exactly easy". HA! It isn't. The best antenna for transmitting is the one which produces the loudest signal at the other station. The best antenna for receiving is the one which produces the best signal/noise ratio at your station. The two are often different, because they're determined by different antenna characteristics. So for starters, you can have two "best" antennas for each station you want to contact, and that "best" will vary with the skip elevation angle, local noise level, and directions and angles the noise is coming from. Have fun! Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
I Want Another Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Antenna reception theory | Antenna | |||
ABOUT - The "T" & Windom Antenna plus Twin Lead Folded Dipole Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Workman BS-1 Dipole Antenna = Easy Mod to make it a Mini-Windom Antenna ! | Shortwave | |||
Antenna Suggestions and Lightning Protection | Shortwave |