Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:50:04 GMT, rocky wrote:
I run up to a KW, dipole and could be using an antenna tuner to stretch the bandwidth. I was just thinking if it could be made even more effective by using other bead material. Looks like #75 offers the best attenuation at 75 M. but if I am getting this right, it will heat up more under high power and off resonance. Hi OM, Think of the beads as series 1W resistors. Ask yourself how much of a common mode load they will present to the antenna "as a source" (this means that the dipole will look like a KW source with complex impedance). You then have to judge the potential that source will present in Common Mode to the beads. Elsewhere in this thread I've done a simplified analysis that suggests 50 #75 beads will get a tad hot under matched conditions because they are dissipating roughly 1.5W each. "Hot" is of little consequence until we shatter the ceramic because of thermal stress (the sintered product contains bulk irregularities). That stress could be arguably applied through a rain drop hitting a bead. Then we get into new issues of balance and symmetry because one part of the bead is cooler than the other. ;-) If, instead for this matched load, you replace the 50 #75 beads with 80 #73 or #77 beads; then you have roughly the same total resistance, but the heat dissipation (still 1W suggested load for each) is spread out more. Again, moving off resonance demands another analysis. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New Program - Coaxial Choke | Antenna | |||
New program - Coax Choke | Boatanchors | |||
New program - Coax Choke | Equipment | |||
New program - Coax Choke | Equipment | |||
New program - Coax Choke | Equipment |