Roy Lewallen wrote:
Frank's wrote:

I think the EH is the same idea as the CFA; in which case the following
paper
says it all: http://www.fi.uba.ar/materias/6654/d...CFAantenna.pdf.

It is hard to imagine going to these lengths to debunk nonsense, but I guess
it is the only way.

And, as we periodically see here, even going to these lengths aren't
completely adequate.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

That's because the EH antenna and the CFA antenna are based on a
religion or faith, not on science.

No matter what facts multiple independent sources submit, those who
have faith will ignore the facts.

73 Tom

wrote:
No matter what facts multiple independent sources submit, those who
have faith will ignore the facts.

:-) That apparently includes individuals with faith in the
lumped circuit model under conditions where it is known to
fail. :-)
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

Cecil Moore wrote:
wrote:
No matter what facts multiple independent sources submit, those who
have faith will ignore the facts.

:-) That apparently includes individuals with faith in the
lumped circuit model under conditions where it is known to
fail. :-)


Aww Cecil, does every thread have to turn into that? 8^)

-73 de Mike KB3EIA -

Cecil Moore wrote:

wrote:

No matter what facts multiple independent sources submit, those who
have faith will ignore the facts.


:-) That apparently includes individuals with faith in the
lumped circuit model under conditions where it is known to
fail. :-)

Cecil

Please drop it. Not every subject is an attack on you, and the rest
should not be used as an opportunity for your propoganda.

It is very tiring.

tom
K0TAR

"Frank's" wrote in message
news:2yUXf.18997$B_1.11490@edtnps89...
Recently heard about EH antennas and have done some research into them
including reading some articles in this newsgroup. It is begining ti
sound very much like my friends homemade FM/TV antenna. My friend being
short on money fastened an old bicycle rim to a piece of galvanized
pipe( axel stuck in the pipe) Feedline was connected from the center o
the wheel to a point on the outer rim. I had repeated told my friend
that something like this would never work and he demonstrated to me
that it did.. I theink the EH antenna is a lot like this old wheel,
just about anything placed on a mast with work to some degree. In this
case a very poor antenna allowed my friend to receive 2 TV stations and
4 or 5 FM radio stations. This was a vast improvement over the 0 tv and
Fm stations he was receving before putting up his "antenna" Would it be
appropriate to say that an EH antenna is more like a coupler that
utilises the antenna support structure(tower/mast) and feedline as the
radiating elements of the antenna?.

I think the EH is the same idea as the CFA; in which case the following
paper
says it all: http://www.fi.uba.ar/materias/6654/d...CFAantenna.pdf.

It is hard to imagine going to these lengths to debunk nonsense, but I
guess
it is the only way.

Frank

I have to admit that at one time I too thought a viable antenna could me
made from lumped values of inductance and capacitance. I was about 12 or 13
at the time. I am also thinking my analogy with the bicycle rim antenna may
not be so far off. LOL