Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
On 8 Apr 2006 10:28:28 -0700, "Ron J" wrote: If a side lobe is a minor lobe, then why is it undesirable to have side lobe levels less than -20 dB? Thanks! Hi Ron, If it were one side lobe, that would be great. If it is several dozen minor side lobes, then that is entirely another matter. The antenna design is devoting too much power in this aggregate. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC As someone who does a lot of V/UHF antenna design, I'd say that -20 is fine, and less than -20 is generally better if it doesn't screw up the whole pattern, which it seldom does. The aggregate of a lot of -20 is an average of less than -20 across the included angles. For EME, which is pickier than HF, it's fine. I'm not sure what Richard could be talking about. Now if you want a 6 meter contest antenna for use in the midwest, you do not want very low sidelobes, but that's a different story. Tom K0TAR |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How would you improve your CB? | CB | |||
Side by Side dipoles | Antenna | |||
Shortwave random-wire antenna question | Shortwave | |||
Actual side by side comparison | Shortwave |