Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Owen Duffy wrote: . . . Reg's response is interesting, I draw the conclusion that a 'quick and dirty' confirmation of quality of a foam cable is whether its measured VF is close to spec, it is it off, so is the Zo likely to be off. Roy Lewallen wrote: I don't agree that this is a good test. The Z0 of cables with solid PE insulation varies considerably, and it's doubtful that the variation is due to variable dielectric constant of the solid insulation. So why should we assume that Z0 variation in foamed dielectric cable is due solely or mostly to the dielectric density? That's right. More important, didn't he say he is matching 35 ohm elements in a vertical array. I'd think mutual coupling would cause much bigger errors than the cable unless he is feeding the elements either at 0 or 180 degree phase. Why worry about Vf and cable impedance when the lements are all over the place in impedance? :-) 73 Tom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Velocity Factor GT unity | Antenna | |||
Velocity factor of an insulated antenna wire. | Antenna | |||
End effect, velocity propagation question | Antenna | |||
Measuring Velocity Factor w/ MFJ-259 | Homebrew | |||
Shielded Loop - Velocity Factor? | Antenna |