Art Unwin KB9MZ wrote:
Happy holidays to all and that includes you Cecil.
Stick to your guns and what you believe in or be content
in just being a follower. Doing that does not prevent
true questioning people from 'getting along'
despite of differences.

And Happy Holidays to you and all people of good will
everywhere (presumably, that excludes SH and OBL :-).

I have a bad habit that I am trying to break - I treat
a person the way he/she treats me. I tend to retaliate
in kind when someone insults my intelligence, education,
or experience. Unfortunately, that makes me completely
incompatible with people like me. :-)
--
73, Cecil, W5DXP

Cecil Moore wrote in message ...
Art Unwin KB9MZ wrote:
Happy holidays to all and that includes you Cecil.
Stick to your guns and what you believe in or be content
in just being a follower. Doing that does not prevent
true questioning people from 'getting along'
despite of differences.

And Happy Holidays to you and all people of good will
everywhere (presumably, that excludes SH and OBL :-).

I have a bad habit that I am trying to break - I treat
a person the way he/she treats me. I tend to retaliate
in kind when someone insults my intelligence, education,
or experience. Unfortunately, that makes me completely
incompatible with people like me. :-)



Why try to break it? Such people obviously want to
comunicate in a agressive and unsettling manner, so
you respond the same way or remain silent.
What really surprises me is some of the acrid statements
made by some experts to innocent non experts who then
fall apart when the table turns !
By the way, on the subject of lumped inductances, have you
found or know of a method to model link coupling ?
My tests using non linked coupled circuits sort of agreed
with computor programs ( lumped spaced inductances) but
unfortunately that where it ends.
I sure would like to model a variometer which is a link
coupling but I don't see a way to do it.
Regards
Art

Regards
Art

Art Unwin KB9MZ wrote:
By the way, on the subject of lumped inductances, have you
found or know of a method to model link coupling ?
My tests using non linked coupled circuits sort of agreed
with computor programs ( lumped spaced inductances) but
unfortunately that where it ends.
I sure would like to model a variometer which is a link
coupling but I don't see a way to do it.

Cebik's web page has a pretty good treatment of mutual
(link) coupling at http://www.cebik.com/link/link0.html
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Cecil Moore wrote in message ...
Art Unwin KB9MZ wrote:
By the way, on the subject of lumped inductances, have you
found or know of a method to model link coupling ?
My tests using non linked coupled circuits sort of agreed
with computor programs ( lumped spaced inductances) but
unfortunately that where it ends.
I sure would like to model a variometer which is a link
coupling but I don't see a way to do it.

Cebik's web page has a pretty good treatment of mutual
(link) coupling at http://www.cebik.com/link/link0.html

Yes, I pointed out Cebik link tutorial earlier this week
on another thread but it doesn't help with the computor modeling.
Art