Cecil Moore wrote:
Tom Donaly wrote:
Give it up, Cecil. You don't even have a coherent notion of the
meaning of the term "phase." Selectively quoting, and re-interpreting
Bibles in order to make it seem as if the Gods agree with you won't cut
it, either. All the simple-minded rural sophistry in the world won't
make you right, or the rest of us wrong.

When you lose the technical argument, Tom, you always respond
with ad hominem attacks devoid of any technical content.


Cecil,

I don't understand why you complain about Tom D. You do exactly the
same thing all through any discussion.

On the QRZ forum you have post after post edited by moderators, that's
something that almost never happens! It's all on QRZ for people to see.
The list moderator even made a very rare public appearance to directly
warn you about your style.

It's pretty tough to have a non-personal technical discussion with you
because you distort facts and resort to the very same ad hominem
attacks you dislike from others.

Why not set a good example rather than yelling about Tom D.?

73 Tom

Cecil Moore wrote:

When you lose the technical argument, Tom, you always respond
with ad hominem attacks devoid of any technical content.

Chuckle. A perfect example of an ad hominem attack devoid of any
technical content.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

Roy Lewallen wrote:

Cecil Moore wrote:
When you lose the technical argument, Tom, you always respond
with ad hominem attacks devoid of any technical content.

Chuckle. A perfect example of an ad hominem attack devoid of any
technical content.

Chuckle. The truth is not an ad hominem attack. Incidentally, Tom
didn't lose the argument to me - he lost it to Balanis.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

wrote:
Why not set a good example rather than yelling about Tom D.?

I'm trying, Tom. Why don't you join me?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp