| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 24 May 2006 12:11:52 -0700, Roy Lewallen
wrote: Richard Clark wrote: . . . Richard's applications and illustrations do not push this boundary. In fact, Ramo et. al distinctly offer the case of "electrostatic shielding" and clearly support the separation of magnetic and electric flux (fields). . . Can you direct me to where in the text they do so? All I've found is a short section (5.28) on "Electrostatic Shielding" where they explain that introducing a grounded conductor near two others will reduce the capacitive coupling between them. Obviously this will alter the local E/H ratio, but in no way does it allow an E or H field to exist independently, even locally, let alone at any distance. Hi Roy, Article 5.12 "Circuit Concepts at High Frequencies or Large Dimensions" Figure 5.28(a) shows a complete shielding. Of course this is entirely electric, and arguably magnetic. However, magnetic flux can penetrate thin shields, electric flux cannot. This is part and parcel to the world of isolated and shielded circuits. The electrostatic shields are as effective as they are complete in their coverage. Their contribution is measured in mutual capacitance between the two points being isolated. With a drain wire to ground, and a low enough Z in that wire, then that mutual capacitance tends towards zero (however, near zero is a matter of degree as I've offered in past discussion). Figure 5.28(a) shielding is quite common in medical circuit design, and mutual capacitance does equal zero; and yet signals and power pass in and out through magnetic coupling. Isolated relays are a very compelling example of magnetic transparency in the face of total electric shielding. Magnetic shielding operates through reflection or dissipation (absorption loss due to eddy currents). This loss is a function of permeability µ. Unfortunately, permeability declines with increasing frequency, and with declining field strength. Basically, all metals exhibit the same characteristic µ above VLF; hence any appeal to "magnetic materials" used to build antennas is specious. This is not to say the magnetic shield is ineffective, merely derated seriously from what might be gleaned through poor inference by reading µ values from tables. However, it is quite obvious that transformer inter stage shielding and the faraday shield found in AM transmitters is not seeking to optimize this attenuation, far from it. Thus the degree in isolation is found in the ratio of the mutual capacitance between the two points before and after shielding; and the attenuation in magnetic flux induction introduced between the two circuits after shielding. Returning to Ramo, et. al, the introduction of a partial shield. Figure 5.28(c) is effective insofar as its ability to reduce mutual capacitance. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! | Antenna | |||
| Steveo Fight Checklist | CB | |||
| Steveo/Race Worrier Fight Schedule so far | CB | |||