Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Reg Edwards" wrote in message ... "Yuri Blanarovich" wrote in message ... Reg wrote: The type of antenna or its radiation pattern has nothing whatever to do with the path taken by the radio wave through the ionosphere. The take-off angle and its name, generated by EZNEC, can be very misleading. It has to do. It allows us to direct the RF under desired angle to hit the layer or region that supports the propagation to the chosen target. ======================================= Yuri, But you can't "direct" it. You have to do your best with whatever elevation angle Eznec dictates. ---- Reg. You bet I can, I can do that with stacked antennas, rotatable, polarization switchable, phasing, crank up tower changing height antennas - and by what antenna design and surroundings dictate, not EZNEC. EZNEC gives approximate picture of radiation pattern produced by antenna model. Real life (ground conditions, surroundings) changes the antenna pattern. So I would be carefull giving EZNEC absolute powers dictating anything :-) Combined with terrain analysis software, it will give better picture of where the antenna projects the signal. 73 Yuri, K3BU |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
That pesky 7238 kHz CW signal | Homebrew | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
signal to noise ratio drops on connecting the antenna | Homebrew | |||
signal to noise ratio drops on connecting the antenna | Homebrew |