| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi Ben
Keeping on mind that the data rate going to/from the sensor is very low compared to the RF I *think* they will co-operate. Some thoughts though; - Opto systems have the problem that you need a power supply for the remote end. Using optical fibre is even a more elegant idea than wires but has a high-ish setup cost. You could of course use a IR LED/optotransistor config but as stated the power supply becomes an issue. - You could argue that infrequent TX RF on the antenna even if it affects the sensor (data) can be ignored . This of course depends on what you are using the weather data for. - If the weather data is a DC/AF level only you can allow RF onto the connection wire. Dont bother to try isolating it from the antenna at all. Dont even think of using shielded/coax. This way the effect on the antenna RF use will be small(er). You could get away with a choke/LPF or two at the antenna base, perhaps even with the use of coaxial stubs. (I'd start with a 1/4 wave open coaxial stub between each wire and antenna metalwork ground (ie where the antenna feed coax joins, then a other two further down)) Running the wire on the inside would of course be best for aesthetic and weather damage considerations. - I'd say the effect of a base decoupled wire on the antenna would be neglible next to that of the aneometer or any box at the antenna tip. You would be capacitively loading the antenna at the "worst" place. (assuming a current node like at the tip of a 1/4 wave) ie it would need a retune. Cheers Bob VK2YQA Ben Jackson wrote: Let's say I have a free-standing vertical HF antenna transmitting about 10wa, and I'd like to run wires to something at the tip. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|