Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
bob wrote:
chuck wrote: Reg Edwards wrote: The permittivity, K, of water is about 80. The relative velocity of propagation along a wire immersed in water is about VF = 1/Sqrt( K ) = 0.11 At a frequency of 7.5 MHz, a 1/4-wavelength of wire immersed in water is only 1.1 metres = 43 inches long. Furthermore, in salt sea water, considering a wire as a transmission line, dielectric loss is so high there is little or no current flowing at the end of a quarterwave radial wire. Longer wires can be disregarded because they carry no current. So, at 7.5 MHz, there is no point in considering a system which has more than a radius of 1.1 metres. At higher frequencies the radius is even less. A copper coin, 1" in diameter, immersed in a large volume of salt water, has an impedance low enough to be used as an efficient ground for a 1/4-wave HF vertical antenna. It is limited by its power handling capacity. I have made measurements years ago but have no records as I didn't attach any importance to them at the time. And still don't. Unpolluted, clean, fresh pond water, is a different kettle of fish. Permittivity is still about 80 but the resistivity is very much greater. About 1000 ohm-metres is a reasonable value. ---- Reg. Interesting info, Reg. I also made some kitchen table-top sal****er measurements about a year ago, but at much lower frequencies than you discuss. My measurements are not handy at the moment, but they don't comport with yours. I utilized a variety of electrode geometries: concentric, 4 pole, parallel plate, etc. Measurements of electric field strength, conductivity, path conductance, etc. are not difficult but interpretation of the data stumped me. As you remember, the conductance of a sal****er path is a direct function of the path's cross-sectional area. A penny doesn't produce much of a cross-sectional area at its end of the path. Maybe your pennies are better than ours, Certainly worth more. 73. Chuck Hi Chuck So what would be the best size cross sectional area to achieve a close to perfect RF ground from 1 to 30 mhz over sea water? Considering things like corrosion, fowling, growth on the plate over time and any other factors that would deteriorate the effectiveness of this connection. You would want adequate safety margin when using this kind of simple direct contact. Bob Hello Bob, Sorry, but I'm not able to answer your question as I'm still struggling to find an appropriate mental construct. For the moment, I'm suspending disbelief, as they say. Roy, W7EL, has reported model results showing that a wire (probably a few millimeters in diameter) only one foot long will produce near-perfect (my words) results. The greater the cross-sectional area, the better, of course, but it would seem not to be a critical factor based on what both Roy and Reg reported, A one inch diameter copper pipe would probably give you some margin based on those reports. Make it a couple of feet long and slip it through six inches or so of one of those foam "noodles" the kids use when swimming. That will keep it afloat, ensure it is visible, and protect the hull from damage when it collides. Remember that you will have to figure out how to attach this pipe to your tuner. In a lot of installations, that will mean six feet or more of wire (from tuner to pipe) hanging over the gunwale. That wire is effectively part of your antenna, and it will radiate. For convenience, it would make sense to let the pipe float away from the hull by six feet or so, but that makes the connecting wire even longer. If you hang something like that over the side you'll doubtless want to secure it with some kind of UV resistant line to take the strain off the wire, especially when under way (ugh!). On some boats, using the stainless rudder shaft could be a better solution if you can attach to it. It is often near the surface of the water. On other boats, the rudder shaft exits the hull well below sea level and that probably wouldn't work. Experiment by all means, and if you go the copper pipe route, just remember that your zinc will be protecting whatever copper you immerse. If you use a lot of copper (like a 1 foot diameter by 1 foot long cylinder made of copper flashing with lots of holes drilled in it), expect accelerated depletion of zinc. Good luck. Chuck ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
To illustrate the order of magnitude of the effects :
An ideal shape of ground electrode is a hemisphere, of diameter D metres, pressed into the soil, flush with the soil surface.. Its resistance to the soil is easily proved and calculated : R = S / Pi / D ohms, where S is the soil's resistivity in ohm-metres and D is the diameter in metres. Pi = 3.14. The metric system is by far the most simple. The resistivity of salt sea water is 0.22 ohm-metres, constant wherever you may sample and test. Unaffected by the melting of the glaciers. So with a diameter of 0.22 metres = 9 inches, the electrode resistance = 1 ohm. Low enough? If the ground electrode is a ball with diameter = 9 inches, immersed in sea water at a sensible depth, then the electrode resistance will be halved. At radio frequencies the impedance of the connection to ground will be that of the connecting wire only, even before the resistance of the connecting wire to the water is taken into account. The high permittivity of water will also tend to decrease impedance at RF. Another illustration, following Lord Kelvin : The resistance of a ground rod to soil is given by : R = S / 2 / Pi / L * ArcSinh( 2 * L / D ) ohms, where S = soil resistivity, L = rod length in metres and D is rod diameter. ArcSinh is the inverse hyperbolic Sine function you will find on your pocket scientific calculators. So in sea water, at low frequencies, a rod 12 inches in length and a diameter of 1 inch will have a resistance of 1.2 ohms. At HF, because of the very low propagation velocity in water, propagation effects predominate and the rod must be considered as a very lossy transmission line. But its impedance to ground is still very low because Zo is very small. So the hull of a metal boat makes an excellent ground. Just connect to it with an alligator clip at the end of a length of wire and stop worrying about it. By the way, the practical units of resistivity in ohm-metres should be much preferred to the academic units of milli-Siemens. When dealing with milli-Siemens I find I have to stand on my head and look backwards. 1 milli-Siemens = 1000 ohm-metres. The clock tells me it's 7.30 in the morning in Birmingham, the idle, depressed ex-industrial city of the Midlands, where there used to be 10,000 factories, now superceded by the hardworking Chinese, and I'm already half way down a bottle of Spanish Campaneo red. Hic! ---- Reg, G4FGQ. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
An arithmetical correction. I forgot to divide by Pi.
The resistance of a hemispherical electrode, 9 inches diameter, in salt sea water, is even smaller. It is only 0.32 ohms. Incidentally. the resistance of a flat circular disk of diameter D metres, in contact with the soil surface, is given by : R = S / 2 / D ohms, where S = soil resistivity in ohm-metres. In sea water, a disk of 12 inches diameter has a resistance of 0.37 ohms. Which is negligible in comparison with the radiation resistance of a 1/4-wave vertical antenna of 36 ohms. Careful readers should make a note of these hints and tips, free to USA citizens, in their notebooks. My own notebooks extend from volumes A to letter S. I'm wondering who to leave them to in my Will & Last Testament. ---- Reg, G4FGQ. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Reg Edwards" wrote:
The clock tells me it's 7.30 in the morning in Birmingham, the idle, depressed ex-industrial city of the Midlands, where there used to be 10,000 factories, now superceded by the hardworking Chinese, and I'm already half way down a bottle of Spanish Campaneo red. Hic! Reg, FYI: "NAPA, Calif. - French and California winemakers marked the 30th anniversary of the storied Paris tasting with another sip-and-spit showdown. California won - and by more than a nose. Native wines took the top five of 10 spots, with a 1971 Ridge Monte Bello cabernet sauvignon from the Santa Cruz mountains coming out on top Wednesday." -- 73, Cecil, W5DXP |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reg, G4FGQ wrote:
"At radio fgrequencies the impedance of the connection to ground will be that of the connecting wire only, even before the resistance of the connecting wire to the water is taken into account." In general, Reg is correct. I`ve installed a marine radio on a yacht, engine powered not the sailing kind. It worked well as expected and the owner paid promptly. I`ve also installed radios of various types in many vessels including large ones used on the high seas and small work boats serving the near offshore. But, I never installed an antenna using radials on a boat or ship. Radials can be hazardous to eyes and body parts at sea. For VHF, a 1/2-wave coaxial antenna has the same gain as a ground plane but needs no radials. For HF, it`s easy and effective to use a loaded vertical antenna against the sea as a return path. Best regards, Richard Harrison, K5WZI |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Radials | Antenna | |||
Grounds | Shortwave | |||
Base Antenna Mounting | CB | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |