Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
bob wrote:
I dont have NEC4 is it too much to ask you to run the model. Radials over sea water versus a direct connection? Sure. How many, how high, and how long? The foot-long wire produces efficiency of virtually unmeasurably close to 100%. So radials can't be significantly better. What sort of efficiency are you expecting from the radials? [I wrote:] Certainly elevated radials would be better than metal more than a skin depth or two deep. Better yet is a wire extending from the surface to a few skin depths. Why isn't that possible? Theres no easy way of making sure that the wires will submerge precisely or close to the ideal skin depth. The loading and heeling of the yacht would affect this depending on the sailing position wind speed and other factors. The motion of the waves and swell conditions will also be another variable. It would work great when you anchored. Why can't you extend a wire or strip all around your boat, or make it several feet long? There's no penalty for having it extend beyond several skin depths. Fishermen somehow manage to keep their lines and nets in the water -- surely you can work out a way to keep a wire in the water. Well if you read the many sailing web pages and the Icom marine guides they all advocate installing your RF ground system well below the skin depth of salt water. They also advocate bonding all your on board metals to submerged objects like the keel and copper ground shoes, which is clearly wrong. Yes. There's a vast amount of incorrect information on the web. Have you ever browsed around audiophile pages dealing with speaker wire? I'm sure there are innumerable astrology pages, too. A yacht with elevated radials installed below the deck would radiate a better signal in my view. However what constitutes an effective radial system over seawater for frequencies between 1 and 30 mhz using a random wire backstay antenna versus a direct connection to sea water i cant answer without the modeling software. All I can do is present the results that physical laws dictate. It's not uncommon for that to be inadequate to change a person's beliefs. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Radials | Antenna | |||
Grounds | Shortwave | |||
Base Antenna Mounting | CB | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |