Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Lewallen writes:
bob wrote: I dont have NEC4 is it too much to ask you to run the model. Radials over sea water versus a direct connection? Sure. How many, how high, and how long? The foot-long wire produces efficiency of virtually unmeasurably close to 100%. So radials can't be significantly better. What sort of efficiency are you expecting from the radials? How does a copper wire behave when submerged in salt water? Won't it corrode rapidly, so that you don't get a metal to salt water connection, but a capacitive coupling across copper oxide? Not a rhetorical question, btw. I really don't know the answer. 73 LA4RT Jon |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Radials | Antenna | |||
Grounds | Shortwave | |||
Base Antenna Mounting | CB | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |