I had Beaker set up an experiment to test this, and after he put out
the fire he started in his hair when the first load he tried melted a
hole in the lab bench, he finally got it set up right. He determined
that the mass of the line increased by about 3.338 femtograms when
powered as compared with it unpowered. We're now looking into what to
do with the line, as it's cluttering up the lab, and we're open to
suggestions.

Regards,
Bunsen

Cecil Moore wrote:
Last week I posted a brainteaser over on qrz.com. Nobody figured
it out. I wonder how many on r.r.a.a can figure it out.

Given: A one second long lossless transmission line with a
steady-state forward power of 200 watts and a reflected power
of 100 watts. How many joules are contained in that feedline?
--
73, Cecil, W5DXP

Dr. Honeydew wrote:

I had Beaker set up an experiment to test this, and after he put out
the fire he started in his hair when the first load he tried melted a
hole in the lab bench, he finally got it set up right. He determined
that the mass of the line increased by about 3.338 femtograms when
powered as compared with it unpowered. We're now looking into what to
do with the line, as it's cluttering up the lab, and we're open to
suggestions.

Regards,
Bunsen


That is the best response we will get.

Even if there are correct ones!

tom
K0TAR