K7ITM wrote:

It's somewhat comforting that it's just as you'd expect from power
delivered versus time. It's an illustration of something I believe Ian
White was trying to get across in another thread: there are commonly
multiple ways to analyze a problem, and if they agree, you MAY have the
right answer. If they disagree, you have at least as many wrong
answers as the number of disagreements (or perhaps the disagreements
only seem to be disagreements).


What I said was that there are commonly multiple methods to analyse the
same problem, but that all correct methods MUST agree, because they are
only different views of the same physical reality.

(I think that amounts to the same as you said above, Tom.)



--
73 from Ian GM3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB)
http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek