Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Roy Lewallen
wrote: Yes. American antenna salesmen haven't yet gotten as sophisticated as the British inventors and purveyors of the CFA. But they're learning. Be patient -- perhaps someday they'll reach that level. The CFA proponents weren't sophisticated at all. The "inventors" probably read half of chapter one of an undergraduate electromagnetics textbook but forgot to read/understand the rest. Another source of embarrassment was that one of the CFA backers was a university EE professor. Go figure. Extraordinary claims but no extraordinary proof. BTW, in case you're interested, the British/Egyptian inventors' U.S. patent number is 5155495. It's patented so it must work... 73s from N4GGO, John Wood (Code 5550) e-mail: Naval Research Laboratory 4555 Overlook Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20375-5337 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Passive Repeater | Antenna | |||
Is magnetic field affected by metal conductor? | Homebrew | |||
F/A New Motorola VHF portable antennas (Motorola Branded!!) | Swap | |||
FA Motorola VHF rubber duck Antennas $4.99 ea. Dealer cost $8.70 List $11.80 | Swap | |||
How was antenna formula for uV/Meter Derived? | Antenna |