Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Ogden wrote:
To return to the ferrite rod antenna: Ignoring the directional null capability (which might be very useful in some real-world circumstances) is there any advantage to a small ferrite rod antenna over a short wire antenna? For the 1980's CA 75m mobile antenna shootouts, a ferrite rod antenna was used for receiving because the local human bodies had much less of an effect upon it than, for instance, upon a hamstick antenna. I always assumed it was because a human body has more of an effect on the E-field than it does on the H-field. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Passive Repeater | Antenna | |||
Is magnetic field affected by metal conductor? | Homebrew | |||
F/A New Motorola VHF portable antennas (Motorola Branded!!) | Swap | |||
FA Motorola VHF rubber duck Antennas $4.99 ea. Dealer cost $8.70 List $11.80 | Swap | |||
How was antenna formula for uV/Meter Derived? | Antenna |