| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 13:25:44 -0400, "Steven R. Jones"
wrote: In attempting to model this design in EZNEC, I do not seem to get the loading effect and shorter length of the radiators to achieve resonance, nor do I get the feedpoint impedance lowering that is described for this sort of loading. Hi Steve, This may well be due to its inability to resonate as advertised. This is not an infrequent complaint. One compelling contradiction is seen in the description of the antenna as being 60% of the conventional length; and the illustration of the antenna built in thirds which would suggest it is 33% of conventional length. Simple errors such as this lead to massive failures in expectation. This leads us to the observation that if you can erect a 1/6th wavelength vertical, what do you stand to gain with this spaghetti design that would put it ahead so much further? 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Current across the antenna loading coil - from scratch | Antenna | |||
| Unequal dipole legs on shortened antenna | Antenna | |||
| vertical dipole? | Antenna | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||