| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cecil Moore wrote:
Gene Fuller wrote: Voltage is often poorly defined since it requires a reference. Yes, and the web page reference provided a well defined reference between two electrodes with known capacitance. There is *always* a relationship between electric field strength and voltage. I disagree that they are unrelated as you implied. I don't see how ionization could occur at zero volts which you seem to imply is a possibility. Huh?? Did I say that? No, but you implied it when you said "ionization threshold has *nothing* to do with voltage". Nothing is zero so you implied an ionization threshold is completely unrelated and independent of volts. Do you want to amend that statement? Maybe: "The relationship between field strength and voltage is sometimes difficult to determine."? If I remember right, your "Dr. Static" thought that you can't have a voltage without the presence of a conductor. You ought to read what these guys write before you quote them. 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Transfer Impedance(LONG) | Shortwave | |||
| ECM Noise on CB | Equipment | |||
| 'Crackling' Noise on HF Band | Shortwave | |||
| RACAL RA-17C12 with DSP / digital readout | Shortwave | |||
| Automatic RF noise cancellation and audio noise measurement | Antenna | |||