Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
John - KD5YI wrote: Well, suppose you have a #18 ga stranded wire composed of 7 strands of #26. One strand is sticking up all by itself. The end of the strand (if cut off squarely) is about 0.0013 cm^2. So a current flow of 0.13 uA from the end of this strand is 100 uA/cm^2. We can suppose all sorts of conditions to obtain corona. There's absolutely no argument about that. The argument is whether corona occurs 100% of the time on any and all antennas with charged particle static. If corona occurs only 99.9% of the time, the corona gang loses the argument. The argument is whether corona *always* accompanies charged particle noise. That's an exclusive assertion that there exists no cases where corona doesn't accompany charged particle noise. I fully agree that corona *often* accompanies charged particle noise but that's an inclusive assertion. If enough particles hit the antenna to just barely hear the noise on a receiver, the corona crowd says that corona caused the noise. I would like to see some proof for such a statement so far out of mainstream physics. Can we suppose a condition where corona won't happen? How about a #14 solid wire with rounded ends? Do you think it could build up enough charged particle noise to be heard in a receiver without the existence of corona? I applied simple arithmetic to show that 100 uA/cm^2 is almost meaningless because there are conditions much more favorable to the generation of corona to consider. If I am wrong, please correct me. Frankly, I think you should try to make up a condition that refutes your own suppositions and see if it flys. If it does, then think of something else. I do that all the time. Sometimes I learn, and sometimes I don't. I try to temper my investigations by asking questions. Why #14 with rounded ends? Because it supports your position? Why not suppose smaller wire and sharper points? Make some calculations for us to review. Use the worst case against yourself, then show why it cannot be so. Frankly, Cecil, I have been somewhat of a follower of yours for some time. You have some thought-provoking ideas and comments, but I am beginning to believe that your entire purpose is to argue. I wish it wasn't so. John |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Transfer Impedance(LONG) | Shortwave | |||
ECM Noise on CB | Equipment | |||
'Crackling' Noise on HF Band | Shortwave | |||
RACAL RA-17C12 with DSP / digital readout | Shortwave | |||
Automatic RF noise cancellation and audio noise measurement | Antenna |