| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gene Fuller wrote:
Why should there be a simple answer? Because conservation of energy is a very simple concept. Energy either exists or it doesn't. If it doesn't, corona is impossible. I already told you that is not the path I would take if I wanted to find a quantitative solution. I know that already and your particular quantitative solution explains absolutely nothing about reality so it has to be taken on faith. Quantum physics is currently filled with such solutions. Nobody can prove that virtual photons exist because if virtual photons could be proved to exist, they wouldn't be virtual anymore. That's essentially the same argument you are using. "Forget energy reality and place your faith in my religious mathematical model that doesn't require any energy". Sorry, but no thanks. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Transfer Impedance(LONG) | Shortwave | |||
| ECM Noise on CB | Equipment | |||
| 'Crackling' Noise on HF Band | Shortwave | |||
| RACAL RA-17C12 with DSP / digital readout | Shortwave | |||
| Automatic RF noise cancellation and audio noise measurement | Antenna | |||