Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() It is perfectly obvious, at DC and low frequencies, the resistances of the two inner conductors are in parallel with each other. So with a fixed voltage at one end there will be a greater power dissipated in a load resistance at the receiving end. Outer conductor resistance has a secondary effect. By connecting two cables in parallel the resulting attenuation will be smaller. But as Cecil implies, for exact calculations, cable impedance, cable length, generator and load resistances, and SWR enter the argument. In general, it is a complete waste of time, trouble and cost to connect coaxial cables in parallel merely to obtain a different Zo impedance. If a reduction in line loss is the objective, then the most economic and effective procedure is to use thicker wires in the transmission line and let line impedance look after itself. ---- Reg. G4FGQ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SWR - wtf? | CB | |||
SWR - wtf? | Antenna | |||
How to measure soil constants at HF | Antenna | |||
feedline impedance | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit | Antenna |