Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
E-field probe question
A simple E-field probe for measuring
near-field radiation (to verify compliance with FCC limits) is described at: http://www.kn4s.com/rf.html RF Safety (about halfway through the document) My question is this: Looking only at the two plates separated by 10 cm, what is the impedance the plates would present to a measuring device in the hf spectrum? Is there a simple way to calculate (estimate) the impedance? Is the charging circuit time constant a simple function of the resistivity of air? Ordinarily, a 10 megohm instrument would load such a probe excessively because the probe's impedance would be much higher than 10 megohms. Many thanks. Chuck NT3G ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
E-field probe question
On Sat, 08 Jul 2006 10:38:18 -0400, chuck wrote:
My question is this: Looking only at the two plates separated by 10 cm, what is the impedance the plates would present to a measuring device in the hf spectrum? Hi Chuck, From their own page: "the capacitance of its plates (1.8 pF)" There are enough dimensional clues to compute this yourself, however. Is there a simple way to calculate (estimate) the impedance? Xc = 1/(2 · pi · f · C) Is the charging circuit time constant a simple function of the resistivity of air? No. Ordinarily, a 10 megohm instrument would load such a probe excessively because the probe's impedance would be much higher than 10 megohms. The probe's resistance is what that is important, not its impedance (which is to say the reactance is immaterial except as a scaling factor as described). In that regard, the resistance is nearly infinite for all practical purposes. A 10 Meg Ohm meter would take 10 ms to discharge in comparison to 0.1 µs to recharge. The circuit is a clamping circuit (or peak detector) that automatically disconnects any load from the probe. The actual load is the sag in the charge to the capacitor. The ratio of charge/discharge insures that the volt meter is quite transparent to the probe - unless you are after an accuracy that borders on delusion. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
E-field probe question
On Sat, 08 Jul 2006 09:09:02 -0700, Richard Clark
wrote: A 10 Meg Ohm meter would take 10 ms to discharge in comparison to 0.1 µs to recharge. This was rather a hip-shot guesstimate where I put the cap on the wrong side of the isolation line's resistance. Anyway, there's still a significant charge/discharge ratio that isolates the meter. On the other hand, having called it a clamping circuit was a stretch too. It is in fact a rather sloppy design in that regard (it is self discharging) but this is not to say it lacks its intended utility. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
E-field probe question
Richard Clark wrote:
On Sat, 08 Jul 2006 09:09:02 -0700, Richard Clark wrote: A 10 Meg Ohm meter would take 10 ms to discharge in comparison to 0.1 µs to recharge. This was rather a hip-shot guesstimate where I put the cap on the wrong side of the isolation line's resistance. Anyway, there's still a significant charge/discharge ratio that isolates the meter. On the other hand, having called it a clamping circuit was a stretch too. It is in fact a rather sloppy design in that regard (it is self discharging) but this is not to say it lacks its intended utility. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Thanks for the info, Richard. What I was looking for was information on the charging part of the circuit. It is not clear to me how or why the 1.8 pF should recharge from the E-field in 0.1 uS. The 0.1 uS time constant suggests a 5.6 megohm resistance in the charging circuit. From where does that resistance arise? Put differently, what limits the rate at which energy can be extracted from an E-field through a capacitance of 1.8 pF? Thanks. Chuck ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
E-field probe question
On Sat, 08 Jul 2006 13:08:18 -0400, chuck wrote:
Thanks for the info, Richard. What I was looking for was information on the charging part of the circuit. It is not clear to me how or why the 1.8 pF should recharge from the E-field in 0.1 uS. Hi Chuck, As I said, an error with shooting from the hip. Besides, it is not the plates of the probe that are charging when compared to the 0.01µF cap, lead resistors, and meter. Rather, that probe capacitance (according to the author) is part of the reactance that is in series with the reactance of the diode. I'm not entirely convinced of the text's accuracy, but I'm not motivated to read it deeply either. The diode capacitance is a moving target and even its average is unsuitable for the analysis presented by the author. The 0.1 uS number was drawn from a hat for an average over the HF region when the series resistance is low - guaranteed for at least half a cycle when there is no stored charge. This returns us to the interpretation of the clamping circuit, but this interpretation remains tenuous. Put differently, what limits the rate at which energy can be extracted from an E-field through a capacitance of 1.8 pF? The source resistance, which in this case is the field. To describe further embarks us upon the nature of extracting the signal's strength from the field, and then on to matters of matching load to the source. Beyond that, it becomes an issue of efficiency. However, with respect to the proposed probe, matching and efficiency are not a concern. The point of the 0.01 capacitor (not the plate structure of the probe) is to store sufficient charge (undrained by the meter load) so as to effectively become an open circuit to power demand - for half a cycle at least in the design offered. The point of a probe is to not disturb the field (not take power, and to return as much energy as was extracted). 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
E-field probe question
Thanks for the additional comments,
Richard. The probe seems remarkable in being able to utilize a 10 megohm DMM to measure an RF field given that a DMM would not work at all to measure a static electric field. Static field measurements are almost always done with extremely high input resistance electrometers, fieldmeters, and field mills. All of these usually incorporate voltage follower op amps or something similar to keep the input resistance above 10 exp(13) ohms. Hooking up a DMM would quickly discharge any electrodes in the field. Thanks again. Chuck ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
PSK31 on Field Day Question | Digital | |||
PSK31 on Field Day Question | Digital | |||
Calibratable Field Strength Meter? | Homebrew | |||
Calibratable Field Strength Meter? | Homebrew |