Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I am designing the instrument. I am exploring the number of samples required to reduce the effect of chance on the measurement result (in respect of the sampling issue) to an acceptable figure. ======================================== The first thing to do is calibrate the instrument against a standard noise source. Immediately, the uncertainty in the standard is transferred to the instrument - plus some more uncertainty due to the manner in which the standard and instrument are associated. Does the instrument read in watts, decibels, or what? The second thing to do is to be verbally and numerically more precise about "to reduce the effect of chance on the measurement result to an acceptable figure." At the outset you should define the acceptable figure. What effects? In what units is the acceptable figure? It is then not a difficult matter to decide the number of measurements, by taking samples, to give a predetermined level of confidence in the average or mean. But I have the feeling you are over-flogging the issue. You don't really have a problem. ---- Reg. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Resonant Stub Measurement | Antenna | |||
Resonant stub measurement | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
Stunning Consumer Confidence Fall | Shortwave | |||
Consumer confidence falls! | Scanner |