Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Lewallen wrote:
John Popelish wrote: Picture a half wave disk of metal as the ground plane, producing the inverted image of the vertical. . . It appears that what I've been writing the past few days either isn't being read or isn't being believed. Among it is an explanation of why a "ground plane" doesn't produce an "image" of the vertical. Since you appear to continue to believe this, please explain the mechanism by which you think a half wave disk produces an "image" of the vertical. The disk forms an image by allowing the electric field lines to terminate perpendicular to the "mirror" surface on exactly the same lines as if they were heading toward a lower half of a dipole, while the radial currents in the "mirror" allow the magnetic field lines to encircle the monopole in the same pattern they would form if the missing half of the dipole were in position. This same pattern of electric and magnetic fields above the "mirror" produces (half of the) photons that the full dipole would have produced. A half wave diameter disk is about the minimum size "mirror" that will keep the field patterns close enough to those of the dipole to launch those photons. A larger disk would do better, but not a lot better. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Radials | Antenna | |||
Vertical ant gain vs No radials | Antenna | |||
Radials for a Vertical ? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |