Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 19:40:59 -0400, John Popelish
wrote: I guess the perceived quality of any given metaphor depends on your mental model of the rest of the universe. Antennas and photons work for me. If they don't work for you, I have no problem with that. hi John, It would seem that they "don't" work for you. I have no problem shifting to a photonic dialog, but you have yet to emerge from a rather muddy start. Remember, it is Cecil, not me, who demands agreement or eternal verbal torture. I can torture with the best of them too. Choose your metaphors well to avoid the embarrassment of Abu Graib. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Radials | Antenna | |||
Vertical ant gain vs No radials | Antenna | |||
Radials for a Vertical ? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |